Re: Next Gen JDEE

Paul Landes <[email protected]> writes:

> Regarding CEDET: I can be convinced to use it, but my experience with
> it (and trying to fix things during idle time etc) has been a little
> negative. Another reason is it has to keep up with the changes of the
> Java language. The idea is there are Java syntax parsing tools that
> will keep up with the changes faster than sematic.

All such changes should be local to jdee2, mainly in the java.bnf and
associated action code. Unless you find bugs/deficiencies in
CEDET/Semantic, of course.

Merely using an external tool that can "parse Java" doesn't provide full
Emacs integration.


-- 
-- Stephe

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/