Re: Proposed New Structure (starter for 10)
[email protected] (Phillip Lord) Wed, 26 Aug 2015 15:25:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.jdee.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Landes <[email protected]> writes: > I really don't see much downside to leaving CIDER a dependency. Development of > JDEE via cider/Clojure I think would be much faster and it has a solid > development community. Yes, that is my end conclusion also. > Is the proposed change to nrepl-client.el going to be merged and > maintained in the CIDER code base? It wasn't so proposal as a discussion. Bozhidar was potentially interested, less for JDEE but for non-jvm usage. But, it's not clearl who would do the work. We certainly do not have a compelling use case for it at the moment. > If it's a fork we might want to think about just staying with CIDER > indefinitely. > > I agree about CIDER--worked with it quit a bit and it is solid. To reiterate > what you mentioned earlier it already gives a lot of what JDEE needs (i.e. > javadoc, source etc). > > I also very much agree with letting the build tool manage (class/source) > paths, which would lead to wacking a lot of code and a simpler JDEE. At the moment, I am concerned about how the build tool should be launched. Maven, for example, is quite tricky to launch from within a running JVM. So, I am not clear where, for example, "compile" functionality should go -- JDEE as is (via an external process) or jdee-live (via direct JVM invocation). Incidentally, I was thinking of renaming jdee-live again to "jive" just for shortness. Phil > > > On Aug 26, 2015, at 8:20 AM, Phillip Lord <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> There is a dependency on cider, yes. >> >> My initial feeling was that this could be a short term dependency till >> nrepl-client.el was wound out, but in practice, I am using cider for >> other things. As well as programmatic JVM access (for Emacs to use), it >> also provides a nice shell for users to access the JVM directly. And a >> significant amount of the middleware and UI is going to be useful to >> both. >> >> I've also been looking a malabar mode, though, and I do wonder whether I >> am achieving anything that is not already there. It's an open question I >> think. >> >> The other question is one about data -- I believe that we should reduce >> the number of things that JDEE knows about as far as possible -- >> classpath for instance, and leave that to the build tool (whether that >> is maven, ant or gradle). But this is a big change and one likely to >> have many implications. >> >> >> >> Paul Landes <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> So there is no dependency on Cider? >>> >>> I'll take a look at some point soon as I'm up to my ears in work. >>> >>> >>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Phillip Lord <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Lee Hinman <[email protected]> writes: >>>>>> I have advanced this somewhat now and would be interested in opinions. >>>>>> I now have a worked nREPL connection to a live JVM running over the >>>>>> project. This provides the equivalent of the "beanshell interpreter" >>>>>> from a user perspective (i.e a shell) and can also be used to drive >>>>>> JVM interaction for things like introspection. >>>>> >>>>> I took a look, looks cool and seems to work! >>>> >>>> Good! >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Unlike, beanshell, I think we can easily support class reloading (i.e. >>>>>> live update the JVM for newly compiled classes), and extension of the >>>>>> classpath (so we can add new maven dependencies without restarting). >>>>>> We should be able to steal a lot of work from Cider (it's stacktrace >>>>>> support is nice!). >>>>> >>>>> Something that will have to be ironed out is redirection of streams, I >>>>> noticed that Standard Out went into the *Messages* buffer, but that >>>>> shouldn't be too hard to hook up. >>>> >>>> Actually, that's a fake! Standard Out actually goes to a process buffer. >>>> I just "tee" it to the *Messages* buffer so I can see what it says. >>>> >>>> I need to do something more intelligent, I agree. In the ideal world, it >>>> should be silent if it works, and popup a buffer if it crashes. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> The build is a little baroque at the moment, although it requires only >>>>>> standard tools, so is clean. From a user perspective, it will require >>>>>> maven, but no other downloads (once it's on Maven central). It's maven >>>>>> agnostic, though, so we *should* be able to support gradle, ant, any >>>>>> other build system or none with a little work. >>>>> >>>>> I opened a comment for the only issue I ran into when installing this >>>>> here: https://github.com/phillord/jde-with-clojure-backend/issues/1 >>>> >>>> Fixed there. >>>> >>>> >>>>>> I've renamed jde-interactive to jdee-live and removed my minimal ELPA >>>>>> compliant minimal jde as that is pointless now. My plan for the future >>>>>> is to get one vaguely useful tool working, so I can test interaction >>>>>> with the Clojure based middleware, then stop, until it is clear that >>>>>> this is the way forward. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts welcome! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for the work, I think this looks great so far, hopefully it can >>>>> be make useful here soon! (to me, useful means I can compile or check >>>>> compilation from a Java buffer) >>>> >>>> Compilation is a reasonable aim. I am trying to put "pomegranate" into >>>> place, so I can extend the classpath on-the-fly. After that, "compile" >>>> seems a reasonable aim, although this means I have to interact with >>>> maven to get it to launch the compile goal. Guess what? There are >>>> several different ways to do it and the documentation is rubbish for all >>>> of them. Maven, maven, maven. I might give up and see if cider >>>> completion code (middleware or emacs client) is reusable instead. >>>> >>>> Anyone else? I don't want to carry on with this for too long if I am the >>>> only one who thinks it makes sense. >>>> >>>> Phil >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> jdee-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jdee-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------