Re: Did anyone try the jdk 9 repl?

Yep, that makes sense.

Phil

Paul Landes <[email protected]> writes:

> I'm thinking of some kind of straight forward REPL type functionality as a
> separate module if someone really wants it. Not anything that would tie too
> much into the guts of JDEE.
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Phillip Lord <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Paul Landes <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> I'm in favor of moving forward with the Clojure back end. Clojure tooling
>>> makes the Emacs side of things much easier as Phil mentioned earlier.
>>> 
>>> I _do_ think it would be possible really to support both the Java REPL and
>>> Clojure, however, it wouldn't make sense to duplicate core JDEE IDE type
>>> functionality like method/class completion, wizards, etc.
>> 
>> 
>> With the amount of developer time that we have, I think this is
>> impractical. It's going to mean having data in two different places,
>> getting two classpaths correct and it also missed one the main
>> advantages -- that maintaining all of this information is shunted
>> largely to the JVM.
>> 
>> 
>> Phil

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140