RE: jde-import-kill-extra-imports not working
"Paul Kinnucan" <[email protected]> Mon, 5 Nov 2007 09:47:15 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.jdee |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <F03210F0450CD9478D44CF85F5405EB7866CCE@MESSAGE-AH.ad.mathworks.com> |
Hi Carlos, I think it would be best if I moved the JDEE myself to Sourceforge. I will have this completed by next weekend. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Carlos Konstanski [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2007 5:06 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: jde-import-kill-extra-imports not working > > At Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:58:25 +0000, > Phillip Lord wrote: > > I would move to sourceforge or gna.org. This is straightforward enough. > Then > > pull the current cvs into a svn as quite a lot more people are using > this > > nowadays (it's not essential though). > > > > The jobs that need doing are: > > > > 1) checking patches for people without svn/cvs access. > > 2) adding people to svn/cvs where appropriate > > 3) organising a release schedule. In practice, this means doing a new > release > > when ever enough patches have come in. > > 4) Updating the website with new tarballs, new zips. > > > > As an added extra: > > > > 5) add a top level makefile to build packages for the various linuxes -- > rpm, > > gentoo and the like. Or add autoconf support which should bring the > former > > nearly for free I think. I'm not a real package expert. > > > > Once the release mechanism is fixed, then use can be made of existing > > patches. This would at least keep JDE ticking over. > > > > I'm afraid I am not volunteering here; I rarely code Java these days, so > I can > > live without. But it would be nice to have the option to use Emacs for > those > > occasions that I do. > > > > Phil > > OK, the weekend is here and I am ready to do this thing. First of > all, do we have buyoff from the author/current maintainer to move JDEE > to sourceforge? I hereby officially ask the individual(s) in charge > if it's all right for me to set up a JDEE sourceforge project and move > the CVS repository there, in accordance with the promises I made > earlier in this thread.