Re: preview-latex icon proposal

Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes:

> * Jan-Ake Larsson (2005-02-17) writes:
>
>> How about this?
>
> I just looked at <URL:http://jimmac.musichall.cz/icons.php> and there
> are no icons which are nearly as blurry as my proposal.  (Boy, it is
> really impressive what that guy can do.)  As I don't know how to
> disable anti-aliasing when exporting from Inkscape and my own "hinting
> capabilities" are somewhat limited, your proposal is probably
> preferable.  Even though I find the icons look old-fashioned.
>
> Here is nevertheless a version a) with rounded triangles but no black
> border and b) with Jan-=C5ke's triangles and the manikin from my
> proposal included:

By far the best so far in my opinion.  Good enough that I am annoyed I
took up the fight with Metapost and Gimp again.  Since I put in that
amount of work again, however, it would be frustrating not even to
look at it in case it is reasonably easy for you to fill in the men
(and we still need the exclamation mark, anyway).

Could you do so, so that we may at least see whether my last batch of
triangles might be better or worse than the corrected ones by Jan-=C5ke?
Since 12 really is very skimpy, I've thrown in a 14x14 version, too.

Thanks,

--=20
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum