Re: preview-latex 0.9 released...
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:20:58 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.latex.preview.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* David Kastrup (2005-03-03) writes:
> This is the large update everybody has been waiting for.
Cool!
> dvipng (version 1.4 or later: teTeX-3.0
> works, TeXlive2004 not)
Ouch! Why is that?
> The installation procedure has been made more flexible and robust,
> more conservative in the installation choices, and the Lisp startup
> file will now be installed automatically.
Okay, I just made a `cvs up', `make clean', `./autogen.sh' and
`./configure'. This is what I got in Makefile:
prefix = /usr/local$(null)
lispdir = ${datadir}/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp$(null)
icondir = ${packagelispdir}/images$(null)
datadir = ${prefix}/share$(null)
packagedir = no$(null)
packagelispdir = ${datadir}/emacs/22.0.50/site-lisp/preview$(null)
auctexdir = /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp$(null)
Is it supposed to be like this? I was used to get a site-lisp
directory which is not special to a certain Emacs version. That means
usually preview-latex was installed into
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/preview/.
(BTW, I did not use `preview-report-bug' because I haven't installed
the new version yet due to this issue.)
--
Ralf
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click