Re: Re: Specifying outlining scheme
Dave Pawson <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Oct 2012 07:56:39 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.nxml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEncD4eWUA2p97MZyTBsJJBRDtrw0jNZnJ5mxJx8WjO9DgnWYw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 13 October 2012 22:48, RonB <[email protected]> wrote: > How terrifically unclear I must have been for you to imagine that "read the documentation" could be a helpful response! :-) Let me try to do a better job than my initial poor attempt: > > Manually changing "nxml-section-element-name-regexp" every time I open a new XML file that has a different associated schema (to be excruciatingly explicit: I've read the documentation, schemas are being loaded just fine, and are beside the point of the question) is an error-prone waste of my time. My question was whether there's some trick to avoiding this that I haven't grokked and, assuming not (given I've of course read the documentation and far too many web ramblings as well, along with goodly chunks of the code), whether anyone has a patch that would produce the fairly obvious solution of letting people store (what is, after all, meta-schema information that doesn't logically belong in an editor variable) this directive inside their .rnc schema file as an annotation? I apologise if I misinterpreted the question. I can now state that I really don't understand it. fyi. Having used nxml-mode since it was released (by James Clark, not emacsen) I have never had to use nxml-section-element-name-regexp so I can't see what the problem was. I assumed (wrongly it seems) that you wanted to associate another schema with some subset of the document that was not a valid start point for the schema in use. > > Perhaps nxml-mode users are very homogenous and pretty much all work on just DocBook (the default regexp appears to be DocBook-centric) and so this just isn't an issue for most people, I dunno. Clearly, it's not a design anybody who works on a wide variety of schemas would find tolerable, unless there's a trick I've missed. I do work in docbook, but also about a dozen others, some my own... how does this affect your question? > > Barring any nice workaround laying about, I wonder if anyone on the list has enough experience with the code to give me a code review if I get ambitious enough to write my own patch? Clearly not. I use elisp a little, but not enough to rise to JC level of code. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emacs-nxml-mode/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/emacs-nxml-mode/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/