bug#3727: NS: wrong font chosen
Adrian Robert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:12 PM, David Reitter wrote: > On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Adrian Robert wrote: > >> Hmm, Lucida Calligraphy has 'italic' set, which I assume causes >> emacs to not use it for non-italic text. However, I wonder why it >> is creating a synth-italic entity here -- it shouldn't. > > That's right, there's only an italic variant of it. (If I demand > italic, it uses it and does NOT use a synthetic variant.) > > If there's only an italic variant, it should be used as regular, > and, in principle, the italic variant should be realized as a > synthetic font. Normally what I've seen done there in print is > that if a block of text is emphasized in italics, the extra- > emphasized portions of it are then regular. So you could create a > synthetic variant with slant to the left (using the existing slant > (degree) information). I'm not sure this is a call that should be made by the driver or the emacs core (when it asks for fonts in family X, and only italic comes back).