bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails

>>>>> In <[email protected]> 
>>>>>	Torsten Bronger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with:
> >
> > (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "")
> >
> > change the situation?

> It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only
> slightly.

Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original
reporter provided?

Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be
skipped:

(unless epg-process-filter-running ...)

Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion?  It would be
something like:

(message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running)

Regards,
-- 
Daiki Ueno