bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails
Torsten Bronger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs |
|---|---|
| Organization | Phoenix Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hallöchen! Daiki Ueno writes: > [...] > >>> Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with: >>> >>> (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "") >>> >>> change the situation? > >> It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only >> slightly. > > Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original > reporter provided? It's every time: gpg --no-tty --status-fd 1 --yes --command-fd 0 --output /tmp/epg-output6267bsQ - [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0 gpg: Signatur am Mo 29 Jun 2009 10:31:28 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID 9F516B77, erfolgt [GNUPG:] SIG_ID jkbjBUZ5Lu5ozCYNw6Tsx9qYwsY 2009-06-29 1246264288 [GNUPG:] GOODSIG D5E3CEFC9F516B77 Torsten Bronger <[email protected]> gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von 'Torsten Bronger <[email protected]>' [GNUPG:] VALIDSIG C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77 2009-06-29 1246264288 0 3 0 17 2 01 C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77 [GNUPG:] TRUST_ULTIMATE > Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be > skipped: > > (unless epg-process-filter-running ...) > > Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be > something like: > > (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) And where should I put it exactly? (I don't speak Lisp.) I now wrote (unless epg-process-filter-running (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) And then, *Messages* say epg-process-filter-running: nil Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: [email protected] or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com