Re: Semantic does not correctly show PRIVATE/PROTECTED methods to a class of whom those private/protected methods belong

Oh well,

Thanks all.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Ludlam [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 28 November 2014 01:35
To: David Engster; Dixon Ryan (ETAS/ESW6)
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [cedet-semantic] Semantic does not correctly show PRIVATE/PROTECTED methods to a class of whom those private/protected methods belong

On 11/27/2014 02:35 PM, David Engster wrote:
> Dixon Ryan writes:
>> So please revert any changes you applied because one needs to have 
>> the class keyword!
>
> Yes, the C++03 standard indeed says this. However, when you 
> forward-declare the class, like
>
>    class A;
>    class B
>    {
>       friend A;
>    };
>
> then this is unambiguous and most compilers will happily accept it. I 
> think in C++11 this is also now "officially" allowed. I just checked 
> and GCC accepts this since version 4.7 also for C++03. So I think 
> Eric's patches are the right thing to do.

Thanks for checking on this David.

Eric

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk