[emacs-w3m:13263] Re: Build errors - bad fd number
Colin Baxter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.w3m |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> Katsumi Yamaoka <[email protected]> writes: > In [emacs-w3m:13257] > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 21:53:12 -0500, Boruch Baum wrote: >> But in Colin's original email [13248], the reported log says >> cygpath wasn't found, so he wasn't using cygwin, right? First, my apologises for the delay in replying. It seems to take a day or so before I see posts. I'm not using MS-windows. My system is 3.16.0-7-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.59-1 (2018-10-03) i686 GNU/Linux. > Indeed. I'm going to try it on Fedora 29 Linux tonight (in > Japan). I can confirm the 'Syntax error; bad fd number' is *not* present if I use the latest Autoconf version 2.69, and emacs-w3m builds then satisfactorily. I may be mistaken, but I seem to remember been able to compile emacs-w3m using autoconf 2.13 until a week or so ago. I wonder therefore if a recent but unconnected change in emacs-w3m source has inadvertently led to the need for a later autoconf. Best wishes, Colin. P.S. If users are using a reasonably up-to-date Debian then they will most probably have to install the latest Autoconf themselves. Debian tend to ship 'old' packages; for example, Debian 3.16.59-1 comes with Autoconf 2.13. Emacs-w3m is the only source I've compiled where I have needed to update autoconf. I have been able to use autoconf 2.13 on Emacs-27.0.50, org-mode, auctex - to name but three. Colin Baxter [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- GnuPG fingerprint: 68A8 799C 0230 16E7 BF68 2A27 BBFA 2492 91F5 41C8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------