[emacs-w3m:13267] Re: Build errors - bad fd number

Colin Baxter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.w3m
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dear Boruch,
>>>>> Boruch Baum <[email protected]> writes:

    > On 2019-02-25 06:58, Colin Baxter wrote:
    >> P.S. If users are using a reasonably up-to-date Debian then they
    >> will most probably have to install the latest Autoconf
    >> themselves. Debian tend to ship 'old' packages; for example,
    >> Debian 3.16.59-1 comes with Autoconf 2.13. Emacs-w3m is the only
    >> source I've compiled where I have needed to update autoconf. I
    >> have been able to use autoconf 2.13 on Emacs-27.0.50, org-mode,
    >> auctex - to name but three.

    > Excellent point. You're right. We should be able to build on
    > debian out-of-the-box. Wait a minute. Are you sure? My memory is
    > that debian has never including autoconf by default, and that one
    > had always needed to install 'build-essential'. What system
    > exactly are you using?

cat /etc/debian_version ===> 8.10
uname -a  ===> 3.16.0-7-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.59-1 (2018-10-03) i686

On my system, the package 'build-essentail' only contains:

/usr/share/build-essential
/usr/share/build-essential/essential-packages-list
/usr/share/build-essential/list
/usr/share/doc/build-essential
/usr/share/doc/build-essential/AUTHORS
/usr/share/doc/build-essential/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/build-essential/copyright
/usr/share/doc/build-essential/essential-packages-list
/usr/share/doc/build-essential/list

On the other hand autoconf-2.13 is a separate package listed in synaptic and
contains

/etc/emacs/site-start.d
/etc/emacs/site-start.d/50autoconf.el
/usr/bin/autoconf
/usr/bin/autoheader
/usr/bin/autom4te
/usr/bin/autoreconf
/usr/bin/autoscan
/usr/bin/autoupdate
/usr/bin/ifnames
/usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te
 .... plus more files and directories in /usr/share
 
I built the up-to-date version autoconf-2.69 from source and installed
locally in $HOME.

    > On my debian system, 'apt policy autoconf' shows only different

For me, 'apt policy autoconf' gives an 'invalid operation' with or
without evoking root.

Best wishes,

-- 
Colin Baxter
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.