[emacs-w3m:13267] Re: Build errors - bad fd number
Colin Baxter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.w3m |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Boruch, >>>>> Boruch Baum <[email protected]> writes: > On 2019-02-25 06:58, Colin Baxter wrote: >> P.S. If users are using a reasonably up-to-date Debian then they >> will most probably have to install the latest Autoconf >> themselves. Debian tend to ship 'old' packages; for example, >> Debian 3.16.59-1 comes with Autoconf 2.13. Emacs-w3m is the only >> source I've compiled where I have needed to update autoconf. I >> have been able to use autoconf 2.13 on Emacs-27.0.50, org-mode, >> auctex - to name but three. > Excellent point. You're right. We should be able to build on > debian out-of-the-box. Wait a minute. Are you sure? My memory is > that debian has never including autoconf by default, and that one > had always needed to install 'build-essential'. What system > exactly are you using? cat /etc/debian_version ===> 8.10 uname -a ===> 3.16.0-7-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.59-1 (2018-10-03) i686 On my system, the package 'build-essentail' only contains: /usr/share/build-essential /usr/share/build-essential/essential-packages-list /usr/share/build-essential/list /usr/share/doc/build-essential /usr/share/doc/build-essential/AUTHORS /usr/share/doc/build-essential/changelog.gz /usr/share/doc/build-essential/copyright /usr/share/doc/build-essential/essential-packages-list /usr/share/doc/build-essential/list On the other hand autoconf-2.13 is a separate package listed in synaptic and contains /etc/emacs/site-start.d /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50autoconf.el /usr/bin/autoconf /usr/bin/autoheader /usr/bin/autom4te /usr/bin/autoreconf /usr/bin/autoscan /usr/bin/autoupdate /usr/bin/ifnames /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te .... plus more files and directories in /usr/share I built the up-to-date version autoconf-2.69 from source and installed locally in $HOME. > On my debian system, 'apt policy autoconf' shows only different For me, 'apt policy autoconf' gives an 'invalid operation' with or without evoking root. Best wishes, -- Colin Baxter [email protected]