[emacs-w3m:13327] Re: Another approach to improve w3m-doenload

TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.w3m
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I prefer the third option: adding a new option to w3m command.
If --dump_extra outputs the progress information into the standard error
and output the content into the standard output, it will be possible to
eliminate using awk command from the second option, I think.

>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:26:17 +0900
>> [email protected] (Katsumi Yamaoka) said as follows:

>I worked on the two kinds of approaches to improve w3m-download.
>Both feature:

>Fully asynchronous operation
>Allow parallel downloads at a time
>Progress indicator(s) in the mode-line
>Not eat much Emacs' memory, only a header is cached

>[1] is a version to use a timer that watches the size of a local
>file being downloaded for the progress indicator.  This version
>runs w3m twice separately; runs with the -dump_head option to get
>the header of the remote contents to know the file size and the
>timestamp, and runs with the -dump_source option to download the
>contents directly to a local file.  The latter starts the timer.

>[2] is a version to divide the output of `w3m -dump_extra' to
>two streams using awk; one is for the progress indicator fed to
>an Emacs' process buffer and the other is for the contents of a
>remote file redirecting directly to a local file.

>The both codes are almost complete, however either ones have an
>unavoidable issue on the progress indicator.

>As for [1] the indicator starts to increase after w3m starts to
>write the remote contents to a local file.  It is the time when
>w3m has buffered the contents fully in a local memory, not at
>w3m starts to download.

>Contrary, [2] starts the indicator to increase when w3m starts to
>download, and finishes when w3m has buffered the remote contents
>fully in a local memory, but time w3m takes thereafter to save
>the contents to a local file is not necessarily negligible.  This
>is just the current version's behavior except for the slowness of
>saving though.  This version is equipped with a trick that blinks
>the indicator for a while after the indicator's value gets still.

>The one suitable to a slow connection would be [2], and of which
>perfection is higher.

>Here are two patches according to those two ways respectively.
>Both are aimed to apply to the latest git master.

-- 
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.