[emacs-w3m:13063] Re: https://melpa.org/packages/w3m-20180221.2059.tar: Not found
Colin Baxter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.w3m |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Boruch, >>>>> Boruch Baum <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Albaro, I can;t speak officially on behalf of the project, but > I can explain a point that may be the crux of confusion for many > users of emacs-w3m: The emacs-w3m project has not historically > ever been involved with what MELPA distributes. > What is happening is that an independent downstream party is using > git and github to un-officially mirror the project as a git > repository. At some point that mirror ends up as part of the > github account 'emacs orphanage', and at some point some > independent downstream party made a MELPA recipe for that > repository. I think this information will be much appreciated. It certainly has cleared up my misunderstanding. > The emacs-w3m project has historically distributed its code > directly from the project web site, using CVS. See there for the > officially supported install instructions. > Recently, there *has* been talk on this list about either > migrating the project to git, or running a git repository in > parallel to CVS. That would bring the project itself closer to > being able to act directly as a MELPA source, and to be able to > ensure quality-control on what MELPA users experience with > emacs-w3m. Would not moving from CVS to git add to confusion in that there would be two emacs-w3m git distributions, only one of which would be official. At least with CVS, a user does not have to worry about getting the `wrong' URL, the labels git and CVS being sufficient discriminators. Just a thought. Best wishes, Colin Baxter [email protected]