Re: make-overlay and endpoints

Marcus Harnisch writes:

 > Not at all. I just found it very confusing that instead of using a
 > common "before pos"/"after pos", a rather more colloquial term was
 > used.

Using "if before then ... if after then ..." would require a fourfold
repetition for each combination of open and closed, most likely.

 > The practical problem is in the latest (ca 2012) version of psvn.el
 > which rightfully claims that #'svn-status-blame wouldn't work for
 > XEmacs.

Ah, thanks for the explanation.  I know nothing about the internals of
psvn.el, let me know if I can help though.