Re: port x-symbol to GNU emacs 24.

David Kastrup writes:

 > If you replace the brain fart/typo "XEmacs'" with "X-Symbol's", the
 > paragraph makes wagonloads more sense as the topic of discussion
 > never was XEmacs.

Indeed it does, although I was also confused by "re-encoding".  I
wouldn't call what X-Symbol does "re-encoding", I'd call it
"translating".  (What you call it is up to you, now that you've
explained I can live with "re-encoding".  I'm explaining why the
typo wasn't obvious to me.)

Thanks for explaining.

Steve