top-level packages repo (was maintainer(s) needed: MH-E, Gnus)

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> As far as I can make sense of things, that's because the top-level
> repo tip is at 17 May, but gnus itself is at 27 June, when the
> relevant patch came in.

Yes, that's what I see, too.

Norbert, can you fix the top-level packages repo, please?

thanks,
mike