Re: top-level packages repo

Mike Kupfer writes:

> Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>
>> As far as I can make sense of things, that's because the top-level
>> repo tip is at 17 May, but gnus itself is at 27 June, when the
>> relevant patch came in.
>
> Yes, that's what I see, too.
>
> Norbert, can you fix the top-level packages repo, please?

Is this related to the following, which I see when I pull and then
update at the top of the xemacs-packages tree:

 subrepository sources for xemacs-packages/gnus differ (in checked out version)
 use (l)ocal source (45540f5758d2) or (r)emote source (de9ea3b04d44)?

What should I answer?

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [email protected]
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]