Re: top-level packages repo

Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> Mike Kupfer writes:
> 
> > Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> >
> >> As far as I can make sense of things, that's because the top-level
> >> repo tip is at 17 May, but gnus itself is at 27 June, when the
> >> relevant patch came in.
> >
> > Yes, that's what I see, too.
> >
> > Norbert, can you fix the top-level packages repo, please?
> 
> Is this related to the following, which I see when I pull and then
> update at the top of the xemacs-packages tree:
> 
>  subrepository sources for xemacs-packages/gnus differ (in checked out version)
>  use (l)ocal source (45540f5758d2) or (r)emote source (de9ea3b04d44)?
> 
> What should I answer?

Yes, this is from fixing the top-level repo and from generating a
package tarball for gnus with the digit-char-p fix.  I saw the same
thing when I pulled from Bitbucket.

In this case, you should answer "r".  This is because de9ea3b04d44 is
just 45540f5758d2 plus 2 changesets that get automatically generated
when Norbert builds a new package tarball.

  $ hg log -G -l 3
  @  changeset:   306:de9ea3b04d44
  |  tag:         tip
  |  user:        Norbert Koch <[email protected]>
  |  date:        Fri Sep 18 22:22:00 2015 +0200
  |  summary:     Added tag gnus-2_02 for changeset c347d2ce5863
  |
  o  changeset:   305:c347d2ce5863
  |  tag:         gnus-2_02
  |  user:        Norbert Koch <[email protected]>
  |  date:        Fri Sep 18 22:22:00 2015 +0200
  |  summary:     XEmacs Package Release 2.02
  |
  o  changeset:   304:45540f5758d2
  |  user:        Mike Sperber <[email protected]>
  |  date:        Sat Jun 27 09:08:12 2015 +0200
  |  summary:     Redefine `digit-char-p' only conditionally.
  |
  $

mike