Re: Broken w3 subrepo?
Mike Kupfer <[email protected]> Sat, 03 Oct 2015 16:05:44 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I just did a fresh clone from https://bitbucket.org/xemacs/xemacs-packages and didn't have any problems. Jerry James wrote: > I did an hg pull on the packages to get yesterday's gnus prerelease, > and got nothing, and hg log showed a last top-level update from a > couple of weeks ago: > > changeset: 1137:3720091d7106 > tag: tip > user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> > date: Sat Sep 19 00:35:08 2015 +0200 > summary: pre-release gnus Yes, that's the same tip changeset that I got. > I thought that maybe the recent trouble with the top-level had > something to do with it, so I did a fresh hg clone of the package > repository. Mercurial reported success, but several subrepositories > are missing: [...] > > In short, all subrepos that lie alphabetically after w3 did not get > checked out. I thought maybe running hg update would fetch the rest: [...] > images/open-cap-up.xbm: untracked file differs > abort: untracked files in working directory differ from files in > requested revision (in subrepo xemacs-packages/w3) I don't know what happened there. What do "hg verify", "hg id", and "hg tip" report in the w3 subrepo? > This is from a fresh hg clone; I have not touched anything inside the > w3 subrepo, or any other subrepo for that matter. Also, after running > hg update, I get this: > > $ hg status > M .hgsubstate I usually see that when I've committed something in a subrepo but there hasn't been a top-level commit to incorporate the subrepo change. I don't know if that's the only way you get those results, though. I suspect it's related to the problems you saw in the w3 subrepo. mike