Re: Broken w3 subrepo?
Norbert Koch <[email protected]> Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:28:44 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Jerry James <[email protected]>: Hi Jerry, all, > I did an hg pull on the packages to get yesterday's gnus prerelease, > and got nothing, and hg log showed a last top-level update from a > couple of weeks ago: > > changeset: 1137:3720091d7106 > tag: tip > user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> > date: Sat Sep 19 00:35:08 2015 +0200 > summary: pre-release gnus I see something similar. I have a clone of the repository on a different machine which sits on the same commit. I just did a new clone with the same result, i.e. I get everything but only up to 1137. hg status is clean, so I don't get the strange stuff you see. In my package maintainer's repo I am more advanced. To be more precise: nk@vserv:test% hg log -l 7 changeset: 1143:b2d449e85940 tag: tip user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Sun Oct 04 20:55:46 2015 +0200 summary: pre-release packages (tramp) changeset: 1142:ca49d97d3b1e user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Sun Oct 04 20:49:22 2015 +0200 summary: XEmacs Package Release changeset: 1141:d4b17ec9982d user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Sun Oct 04 20:48:54 2015 +0200 summary: update packages (tramp) changeset: 1140:355cf5e105dc user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Fri Oct 02 10:05:22 2015 +0200 summary: pre-release packages (gnus) changeset: 1139:4b3e5b7f593c user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Fri Oct 02 09:16:23 2015 +0200 summary: XEmacs Package Release changeset: 1138:105d97d2872f user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Fri Oct 02 09:12:17 2015 +0200 summary: package update (gnus) changeset: 1137:3720091d7106 user: Norbert Koch <[email protected]> date: Sat Sep 19 00:35:08 2015 +0200 summary: pre-release gnus To my knowledge I've pushed everything upstream, so I'm honestly wondering where the changesets have gone. Could someone with more insight and more kungfu in mercurial (and bitbucket) please have a look? Thanks, norbert. --