Re: XEmacs at a crossroads

Aidan Kehoe writes:

>  > It seems . . . unlikely that _all_ of these warnings are harmless, so
>  > short of slowly working through all of the cases I don't see that it's
>  > plausible to make a release described as fully 64-bit-compatible.
>
> It’s not *that* unlikely, XEmacs is pretty 64-bit-clean. Grepping through
> the source, the big thing I can see is Hashcode being long; does that
> improve things much? Could you post your error log somewhere?

Will do.

>  > Anybody besides me care about this?
>
> I use XEmacs on an Win64 machine regularly and am frustrated that the only
> recent binary is not recent at all, if that helps.

Yes, it does -- doubles the size of my client base :-).

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: [email protected]
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta