Re: xemacs wiki

Hrvoje Niksic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.xemacs.design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] writes:

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:39:09 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic said:
>
>> At the risk of playing the role of that one annoying guy that butts
>> into the discussion without knowing what it's about, I'll just note
>> that there is no "XEmacs license" -- XEmacs is under the GNU GPL!
>
> Yes, but you can't mix GPL'ed XEmacs code and GPL'ed Emacs code.

Yes you can.  Someone can make a separate package under the GPL that
contains code from both.  Stallman chooses not to use non-assigned
code in GNU Emacs, but that's not a problem with our licensing.

Exactly the same "issue" exists with any non-assigned GPL source code,
e.g. the Linux kernel or Gnome.

> Seems the Emacs code has an additional restriction that copyrights
> need to be assigned.

That restriction is not part of the license, it's just FSF's standard
practice.  If you were to fork your own Emacs, you wouldn't have to
follow it (but you'd have to follow the requirements of the GPL.)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.