Re: Aliasing zmacs-regions, providing a transient-mark-mode
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> Fri, 09 Apr 2004 15:29:55 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Brian" == Brian Palmer <[email protected]> writes: >> No, it's gonna have to be transient-mark-mode or nothing. If I >> were rms I certainly wouldn't s/mark/region/; it's not that bad >> a name that it justifies a global substitution on a user >> variable, so the only reason to do it would be make things >> equally painful for XEmacs users and GNU Emacs users. Brian> In light of the relatively scanty google results, do you Brian> still say that Yes. I don't see good reason to do an alias/rename/defun if we're not going to provide rather close GNU compatibility. If we don't, Kyle's suggestion of a do-nothing defvar for transient-mark-mode which merely is a convenient placeholder for a docstring (cf enable-multibyte-characters) seems appropriate. So what it comes down to is whether Hrvoje's and my sense that there are user-visible differences and they were annoying is valid. If we can show that it mostly is not, then "how do I get the same effect?" is definitely a FAQ, and I'd be willing to go with the original proposal of defalias and defvaralias. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.