Re: [AC21.5] Texinfo manual kilo-patch
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:47:04 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Hrvoje" == Hrvoje Niksic <[email protected]> writes: Hrvoje> Think of it this way: any FP number can be converted to a Hrvoje> rational without loss of precision, while the reverse Hrvoje> doesn't hold. True, but you do lose information: all FP numbers by definition have limited, known precision, but conversion to a rational claims that you've acquired an infinite amount of precision from somewhere. Again, this conversion is something that some, probably most, users would appreciate, but others will not. As Jeff points out, Common Lisp does not convert from float to rational without user intervention. I think the Common Lisp arithmetic rules have been incredibly carefully thought out; we should follow them where possible. Not to mention that conforming to a bad standard is better than inventing a good non-standard. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.