Re: list archive pb

François Revol <[email protected]> writes:

> Selon "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>:
>
>> Yup.  I'll add fixing that to my list.  It's a permissions problem
>> with the archiver.
> Good news.
>
>> There's nothing there related to BeOS in my personal archives, which
>> should be complete.  I'm sorry, but there just doesn't seem to be
> 2004-04-29
> À: [email protected] 
> Re: Re: more from the BeOS port, questions

Hi François, I'm not sure what you're asking.

Do you have a message-id for the message you're interested in or some
more headers?

There could be many articles by a subject of
Re: Re: more from the BeOS port, questions

Was this a message you sent?

Please advise,

Adrian

>
> Didn't that one get through ? or did it get lost in the pipe ?
>
>> anyone else currently active who can even test the BeOS port, let
>> alone participate in development.
>
> I agree there aren't many BeOS aware ppl currently...
> But I hope that won't stop my patch to get to the cvs :)
> (currently some issues to be dealt with before it's 
> in shape, namely, some pty problems 
> (subprocesses doesn't get any input !?), and a crash in 
> DNS client code, which only happeared when I lost my
> internet connection, so I suppose some error 
> isn't handled correctly.
>
> Last WIP:
> http://clapcrest.free.fr/revol/beos/shot_xemacs_native_integrated.png
>
>
> François.
>
>

-- 
Adrian Aichner
 mailto:[email protected]
 http://www.xemacs.org/