Re: confusion (aka specifiers...)
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:44:34 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.emacs.xemacs as well. X-Posting to xemacs-design; people interested in actually hacking specifiers should move discussion there. Users who want to suggest uses or express their interest in having such a feature are welcome to continue on c.e.x, but as usual patches speak louder than other text. >>>>> "giacomo" == giacomo boffi <[email protected]> writes: giacomo> [i'm not sure about the correctness of my lexicon] is it giacomo> possible to add to a specifier an instantiator that giacomo> matches the frame that has the focus? You mean you want (for example) to have the text in the focused frame to be black on some background, while the text in unfocused frames is gray80, say? And when the focus leaves a frame, it turns from black to gray, while the frame that focus enters turns from gray to black? As far as I know, you can't do that currently. It's an interesting idea though, and probably is do-able without performance loss. The main issue I see with trying to implement is that it's not obvious to me where such a specification should rank. Should the `current-focus' spec have precedence, or should the `frame-local' spec get it? -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.