Re: skeleton improvement

On 25 f=E9v 2005, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

> skeletons are good for forms with few options, or where the author want=
s
> more control.

I see.

> Arguably both should be superseded by the Emacs widget library, except
> it's slow, unreliable, and hard to program with.  :-)

OK this is xemacs-design isn't it? What would be the ideal "template mino=
r
mode"? Something as flexible as skeleton, as interactive as tempo and sti=
ll
easy to program?

Pierre