Re: Is xemacs dead?

Dan,

Did you try http://www.xemacs.org?

...Jake

>>>>> "DBD" == Dan Bar Dov <[email protected]> writes:

   DBD> Thanks for answering. 

   DBD> I'm with xemacs since Jamie Zawinsky's days (and Gosling emacs before
   DBD> that). And I'd hate to swap.  How about a heads-up - what is planned
   DBD> for xemacs?

   DBD> Thanks,
   DBD> Dan

   >> -----Original Message-----
   >> From: Stephen J. Turnbull [mailto:[email protected]] 
   >> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:56 AM
   >> To: Dan Bar Dov
   >> Cc: [email protected]
   >> Subject: Re: Is xemacs dead?
   >> 
   >> >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Bar Dov <[email protected]> writes:
   >> 
   Dan> Should I switch to gnu emacs?
   >> 
   >> XEmacs development has been hibernating for a while, but 
   >> whether to switch depends on what you want from the editor.  
   >> For many purposes, GNU has only recently caught up with 
   >> XEmacs in most ways, and there will probably be a new major 
   >> release of XEmacs in a few months which will have most 
   >> recently added GNU features and new XEmacs-only features.
   >> 
   >> -- 
   >> Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     
   >> http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
   >> University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 
   >> Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
   >> My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad 
   >> things.  I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults 
   >> I remember.  Scott Gilbert c.l.py
   >> 

-- 
Jake Colman -- XEmacs Tinkerer