Re: Building the current stable release for Mac OS X?
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:24:20 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "conradwt" == conradwt <[email protected]> writes: conradwt> Hi, is it possible to simply build the xemacs version conradwt> for FreeBSD on Mac OS X and run it via XWindows? Depends on what you mean by that. XEmacs for X definitely builds and runs. However, if you mean using the FreeBSD port, possibly it will not build; Mac OS X is not FreeBSD, and the FreeBSD port may have configuration switches etc that are incompatible with Mac OS X. Fink and maybe DarwinPorts provide binary packages, and both source packages, as well as the XEmacs source distributions, build without problem on all versions of Mac OS X I have used (Jaguar and Panther; I'll be getting Tiger fairly soon). Fink and DarwinPorts (like FreeBSD packages) take care of dependencies (eg, image and sound libraries are automatically built if you don't have them already). I don't mean to deprecate the FreeBSD ports distribution, just to mention alteratives. As long as I'm here, I will say that NetBSD pkgsrc is another distribution which is quite portable, although I haven't used it for three years on Mac OS X. Gentoo's Portage should probably be avoided for now, as the Mac-oriented developers seem to be fascinated by the possibility of replacing parts of Mac OS X with Gentoo ports, and I really don't think that's a good idea, especially if you're still on Panther. -- School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.