Re: no `coding:' in file loc vars
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> 28 Mar 2002 22:48:20 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.mule |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Golubev" == Golubev I N <[email protected]> writes: >> There won't be; coding cookies cause the developers more >> trouble than they're worth. We get lots of bug reports when >> coding cookies fail due to pilot error. Golubev> This means that files originally created in (FSF) emacs Golubev> are not processed in xemacs properly. How do emacs Golubev> developers avoid such a trouble? I doubt they do avoid it. They're just willing to put up with it. How many such files do you have to deal with? Is there usually a reason to specifically avoid a cookie in the first or second line? >> As for `set-auto-coding-function' I'm not sure what you want. Golubev> It is name of a built-in variable in (FSF) emacs. Golubev> It would analyze (raw) file contents to decide coding Golubev> system of file. I think Ben Wing is planning to implemented user-specified coding systems, including detection, in 21.5. You should get in touch with him. But none of this stuff will get ported back to 21.1, for sure. And probably not 21.4, because to read just the _end_ of the file to get the local variables before reading in the whole file probably means adding more than just a line or two. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Don't ask how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.