Re: [COMMIT] Increase READ_BUF_SIZE, used in #'insert-file-contents-internal, to #x10000

Aidan Kehoe writes:

 > [#x20000] works fine and is even better for my use case than #x10000.

+0.9  as I jokingly indicated before.  (I really should look up how
old that comment is, but I bet it's *old*.)

 > What about the following, since alloca_* is more careful about not
 > blowing the stack, and its use shows better intentionality? (Though
 > both buffers actually remain on the stack, with current
 > thresholds.)

+1

"Blowing the stack" is a system-wide problem, and should probably be
handled and tuned in one place.