Re: [PATCH packages] Implement assoc-string

I apologize for the confusion, I was just blowing off steam.

Mats Lidell writes:

 > Is there something wrong with being compatible with Emacs in this
 > case?

Only that it makes me sick to look at it. ;-)  That's not your
problem, or Jerry's. :-)

 > Since we have work arounds for that function it is pretty
 > clear we should have it.

Yes, you are right, and you are right that it is obvious.  That's what
makes me so mad! :-)

For future reference, if I meant we shouldn't be Emacs-compatible in
some case, I'd veto the patch explicitly and propose an alternative
approach.