[P21.4] Fix for CVE-2009-2688
Vin Shelton <[email protected]> Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:43:33 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACeGjnU3A_2G4VMre3L8YH596YC4i=-eGVc4vC_QnMyAU4iY1A@mail.gmail.com> |
I adapted this patch from the gentoo patch by Vincent Danan ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511994). I used uint64_t for the (necessary 8-byte) type, rather than the lisp.h ugliness listed there. Please review. - Vin _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Patches mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches
xem-image.patch
(text/x-patch, 3.6 KB)
diff -r a06923a62e1f src/ChangeLog --- a/src/ChangeLog Sat Feb 14 11:48:30 2015 -0500 +++ b/src/ChangeLog Sat Feb 14 17:19:21 2015 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2015-02-14 Vin Shelton <[email protected]> + + * glyphs-eimage.c: CVE-2009-2688 - Check for images too large + (GIF, TIFF, JPEG and PNG). + 2015-01-29 Vin Shelton <[email protected]> * XEmacs 21.4.23 is released diff -r a06923a62e1f src/glyphs-eimage.c --- a/src/glyphs-eimage.c Sat Feb 14 11:48:30 2015 -0500 +++ b/src/glyphs-eimage.c Sat Feb 14 17:19:21 2015 -0500 @@ -407,6 +407,7 @@ */ { + uint64_t pixels_sq; int jpeg_gray = 0; /* if we're dealing with a grayscale */ /* Step 4: set parameters for decompression. */ @@ -430,6 +431,10 @@ /* Step 6: Read in the data and put into EImage format (8bit RGB triples)*/ + pixels_sq = + (uint64_t) cinfo.output_width * (uint64_t) cinfo.output_height; + if (pixels_sq > ((size_t) -1) / 3) + signal_image_error ("JPEG image too large to instantiate", instantiator); unwind.eimage = (unsigned char*) xmalloc (cinfo.output_width * cinfo.output_height * 3); if (!unwind.eimage) signal_image_error("Unable to allocate enough memory for image", instantiator); @@ -671,6 +676,7 @@ { ColorMapObject *cmo = unwind.giffile->SColorMap; int i, j, row, pass, interlace, slice; + uint64_t pixels_sq; unsigned char *eip; /* interlaced gifs have rows in this order: 0, 8, 16, ..., 4, 12, 20, ..., 2, 6, 10, ..., 1, 3, 5, ... */ @@ -679,6 +685,9 @@ height = unwind.giffile->SHeight; width = unwind.giffile->SWidth; + pixels_sq = (uint64_t) width * (uint64_t) height; + if (pixels_sq > ((size_t) -1) / (3 * unwind.giffile->ImageCount)) + signal_image_error ("GIF image too large to instantiate", instantiator); unwind.eimage = (unsigned char*) xmalloc (width * height * 3 * unwind.giffile->ImageCount); if (!unwind.eimage) @@ -937,8 +946,12 @@ { int y, padding; unsigned char **row_pointers; + uint64_t pixels_sq; height = png_get_image_height(png_ptr, info_ptr); width = png_get_image_width(png_ptr, info_ptr); + pixels_sq = (uint64_t) width * (uint64_t) height; + if (pixels_sq > ((size_t) -1) / 3) + signal_image_error ("PNG image too large to instantiate", instantiator); /* Wow, allocate all the memory. Truly, exciting. Well, yes, there's excitement to be had. It turns out that libpng @@ -949,7 +962,7 @@ padding = 5 * width; unwind.eimage = xnew_array_and_zero (unsigned char, - width * height * 3 + padding); + pixels_sq * 3 + padding); /* libpng expects that the image buffer passed in contains a picture to draw on top of if the png has any transparencies. @@ -1286,6 +1299,7 @@ uint32 *raster; unsigned char *ep; + uint64_t pixels_sq; assert (!NILP (data)); @@ -1308,12 +1322,15 @@ TIFFGetField (unwind.tiff, TIFFTAG_IMAGEWIDTH, &width); TIFFGetField (unwind.tiff, TIFFTAG_IMAGELENGTH, &height); - unwind.eimage = (unsigned char *) xmalloc (width * height * 3); + pixels_sq = (uint64_t) width * (uint64_t) height; + if (pixels_sq >= 1 << 29) + signal_image_error ("TIFF image too large to instantiate", instantiator); + unwind.eimage = (unsigned char *) xmalloc (pixels_sq * 3); /* #### This is little more than proof-of-concept/function testing. It needs to be reimplemented via scanline reads for both memory compactness. */ - raster = (uint32*) _TIFFmalloc (width * height * sizeof (uint32)); + raster = (uint32*) _TIFFmalloc ((tsize_t) (pixels_sq * sizeof (uint32))); if (raster != NULL) { int i,j;