Re: [AC21.5] Cleaning out old work #1: double-cast to fix C++ build

Jerry James wrote:

 > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull <[email protected]> wrote:

 >> I wonder if maybe "long" shouldn't be "EMACS_INT"?  In theory
 >> EMACS_INT could be long long on some platform to accomodate void*,
 >> IIRC.

 > Yes, it should be a pointer-sized int, which is exactly what
 > EMACS_INT is supposed to be.  I should have thought of that way
 > back when.

Thanks for the followup!  But ...

... oops.  EMACS_INT gets defined in lisp.h, which is not #included in
lwlib implementations.  config.h *does* get #included, though.  I'll
look at moving the detection code to config.h.  Someday ...

Anyway, the original patch is good enough for now, I think.  We'll
cross that bridge when we come to it.

Steve