Re: flaky spawning behaviour on 2000, XP
"Ben Wing" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.windows |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006b01c31c2b$48ec4100$0201a8c0@neeeeeee> |
everything *should* work fine under cmd.exe as well. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> To: "Edward Peschko" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 2:29 AM Subject: Re: flaky spawning behaviour on 2000, XP > >>>>> "Edward" == Edward Peschko <[email protected]> writes: > > Edward> hey, I was using xemacs on NT, and noticed the following > Edward> flaky behaviour: > > Edward> 1) I run a shell using 'M-x shell' > > Which build environment (native, Mingw, or Cygwin) and which shell? > > That's very important. MS s-hells, maybe cmd.exe sorta works but I > wouldn't give it any chance to screw up my system. Among the Cygwin > shells, the basic shell (ash-based) is not POSIX compliant and of > course is missing most interesting functionality for command-line use. > bash seems stablest, and I've had reasonable luck so far, but I don't > do serious work on Windows. zsh works but I don't know about extended > use. I wouldn't touch a csh, and I've never used a ksh. > > I only run Cygwin at the moment. > > Note that whether you run native or Cygwin XEmacs doesn't affect your > choice of shell. Also, don't forget that MS will slip you a Mickey > every once in a while: you probably need to be aware of COMSPEC as > well as SHELL to be sure you're getting your shell of choice. > > > -- > Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp > University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN > Ask not how you can "do" free software business; > ask what your business can "do for" free software. >