Re: Characters lost when saving UTF-8 file on win32 (21.5.16)

Vladimir Weinstein <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.xemacs.windows,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I'm a bit confused now - I was under impression that xemacs 21.5 uses
Unicode internally. That is why I have been following it. The characters
that do get whacked are from different parts of Unicode - circled Kanas,
some Hanguls (some pass fine), some Devanagari - it just seems strange
that these characters cannot be represented.

If this is not a possibility, a warning/error should definitely be
issued, because silent changing of the file is really bad.

As far as looking into other editors, xemacs works great for me - I
don't intend to change it. The problem of a good Unicode editor is very
much present. It would be great if xemacs could fill that space :)

Anyway - thanks for your reply!

Regards,
v.

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

>>>>>>"Vladimir" == Vladimir Weinstein <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>
>    Vladimir> When you load an UTF-8 file in xemacs, some characters
>    Vladimir> do not get displayed - instead, a GETA MARK (U+3013) is
>    Vladimir> displayed (looks like this ). This is generally ok for
>    Vladimir> display purposes, but the problem is that when I save
>    Vladimir> that file, all the characters that cannot be displayed
>    Vladimir> get replaced by the GETA MARK, which is unacceptable.
>
>Sorry, you'll have to create a private charset to hold the characters
>you need, or get another editor.  The GETA MARK (which is an older
>convention for U+FFFD REPLACEMENT CHARACTER, from the Japanese JIS X
>0208 standard) means that XEmacs can't represent those characters
>internally with the charsets currently available.  Replacing the
>current Mule internal representation with Unicode is planned, but not
>going to happen soon.
>
>We should signal an error, though, or query the user about how to
>handle those characters.
>
>GNU Emacs may work for your purposes, it has a somewhat extended
>repertoire of characters, although I think that their released
>versions do not cover all of Unicode yet.
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.