Re: Could have known
Vigfús Pálsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Are we really suggesting to use of law 73F here? If it is, then something is missing in this story. Well In Iceland, the ruling is "Next board please" Greetings Vigfus Palsson ----- Upprunaleg skilaboð ----- Frá: "Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> Til: "BLML" <[email protected]> Sent: Föstudagur, 20. Maí, 2016 06:34:39 Efni: [BLML] Could have known >From the latest ABF Newsletter: 8 6 A10 8 7 6 2 K10 2 A Q 9 3 J 4 2 K J 9 5 3 8 4 3 A 9 6 K J 6 3 2 10 9 8 5 4 A K Q 10 7 5 Q 4 Q J 7 5 7 Playing 6S by South, West gets off to sneaky HJ lead. Rising HA, South will discard heart loser on successful club finesse. However upon drawing trumps, East discards heart on third spade, but immediately corrects to spade. Now South feels inclined to play low heart to Q since East's heart is a penalty card. Bad luck, 1 down. So, in OZ, no problem, laughed away, but I presume that in other countries, the "could have known" law would be wheeled out rather quickly. With what result? Cheers, Tony (Sydney) _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml