Re: OLOOT, asked first
"Robert Frick" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <op.yiuu78u9bd67ou@december2014> |
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:39:53 -0400, Sven Pran <[email protected]> wrote: >> Matthias Berghaus >> Am 10.06.2016 um 03:27 schrieb Robert Frick: >> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 21:14:14 -0400, David Grabiner >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Law 47E1: >> >> >> >> A lead out of turn (or play of a card) may be retracted without >> >> further rectification if the player was mistakenly informed by an >> >> opponent that it was his turn to lead or play. A lead or play may not >> >> be accepted by his LHO in this circumstance. >> >> >> >> Therefore, assuming the wrong answer came from declarer or dummy, >> >> declarer cannot accept this lead by spreading his hand. Declarer >> >> picks up his hand, the correct defender leads, and the defenders can > play >> double-dummy. >> > Declarer picks up his hand? That seems overly kind. Does a retracted > OLOOT >> end the auction period? >> >> Who cares? A specific law (here 47E1) overrides any general law. "A lead > or play >> may not be accepted by his LHO in this circumstance". So presumed declarer >> remains declarer since he can`t become dummy. Overly kind? The defenders > are >> going to defend double dummy. If this is kind... >> If you meant kind to the defenders, well, they are the non-offending side > here, >> having been misinformed about the lead, so why should they have a problem? > > [Sven Pran] > Declarer certainly picks up his hand, so the advantage to defenders depends > on how well they noticed and remember declarer's cards. You may be right, but you usually mention a law. Here all you have to say is that an opening lead out of turn ends the auction period. And cite the law. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml