Re: OLOOT, asked first
Steve Willner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016-06-10 3:46 PM, Sven Pran wrote: > So information from the withdrawn card is AI to East and West, and UI to > North and South Several others answered the same, and it's what I would have thought. My problem is I can't find text to justify it. The NS incorrect answer about whose lead it was _ought_ to be an infraction, but I don't see which Law it violates. In contrast, there are specific Laws (21B, 47E2) dealing with incorrect information about partnership understandings. I'm happy, though, with a general principle that when the Laws give someone the right to ask a question, giving an incorrect answer is an infraction. Does "without further rectification" mean the LOOT wasn't an infraction at all? More generally, why doesn't "without further rectification" apply to both sides? _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml