Re: OLOOT, asked first
Steve Willner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016-06-11 3:06 PM, Matthias Berghaus wrote: > If, in similar cases, a card is retracted, (which means that either it > was a revoke, or something happened which made the TD allow the player > in question to retract it) it is always AI to the non-offenders, and UI > to the offenders. As stated in L16D. Which would seem to imply that the card would be UI to West, East being the offender for the LOOT. If "without further rectification" cancels that, why doesn't it also cancel any UI implications for South? You see why I'm having trouble with this? What everyone thinks ought to happen doesn't seem to agree with the written text. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml