Re: OLOOT, asked first
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Robert Frick > Maybe that's not as obvious as I thought. A player makes a mispull, LHO calls, > and then the director is called. The mispull is corrected. Can LHO change his call? > Without rectification? [Sven Pran] Assuming that "mispull" refers to a call and not to a play the answer is "Yes, LHO may change his call without rectification". > A player makes a mispull. The director is called. LHO then makes a call. Law 9 > applies? If LHO doesn't have the right to call now, did LHO have the right to call > before? [Sven Pran] "before" what? > You are on lead against 3NT with 6 running diamond tricks. Your partner revokes, > not following suit. Your best strategy is to play as quickly as possible to the next > trick. [Sven Pran] How can establishing the revoke be a better strategy than avoiding it to become established? Law 64C will eventually be applied resulting in a final result that will certainly be less favourable than had the revoke not been established (instead resulting in a penalty card). I of course assume that the Director knows his job. > Same, except director is called and explains the options. You can still lead to the > next trick? Or do you lose that right? [Sven Pran] You will still have the lead to the next trick but declarer will have three options when instructing you on which denomination to lead. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml