Re: Change of call after illegal call
Matthias Berghaus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 13.07.2016 um 14:42 schrieb Sven Pran: >> Matthias Berghaus >> [...] so could 26 (anybody got an example where 26 would apply?)[Sven > Pran] [...]. > [Sven Pran] > I would expect any Director with some experience to at some time having > ruled Law 26. > > It is compulsory whenever a call has been withdrawn by an offender (and > replaced by a different call), and the offender eventually becomes a Sure. Maybe I found it to unlikely that a side that has enough high cards to double partner would end up declaring, but I can see that this is not necessarilay so. L36 should IMO refer directly to 26B, as a double or redouble of partner`s call does not show a specified suit, but that is no big thing either way > defender. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml