Re: Change of call after illegal call
Matthias Berghaus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 14.07.2016 um 10:36 schrieb Sven Pran:
>> Matthias Berghaus
> {...]
>> L36 should IMO refer directly to 26B, as a double or redouble of
> partner`s call
>> does not show a specified suit, but that is no big thing either way
> [Sven Pran]
> We use support doubles and redoubles over intervening calls from RHO after
> my partner's response bids in his own suit to my own opening bids. These
> support calls show exactly 3 card support in my partner's suit.
>
> So in the auction (example):
> 1D - pass - 1H - Double
> Double
> my inadmissible Double (should have been a redouble) shows exactly 3 hearts.
>
> Would you not agree that this inadmissible double refers to hearts only?
I agree. Good example, you have a point. I only thought about things
like doubling partner, so doubling over a double (or redoubling a
redouble) did not occur to me, but you are of course right.
>
> I think Law 36 is very well written as it is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml