Re: Change of call after illegal call
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Steve Willner > Sent: Friday, 15 July 2016 10:24 AM > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List > Subject: Re: [BLML] Change of call after illegal call > > On 2016-07-13 7:44 AM, Matthias Berghaus wrote: > > Well, you already barred partner (L36B2). As Sven mentioned, L23 > could > > apply, so could 26 (anybody got an example where 26 would apply?). > > I might have missed L26, but it's obvious once you point it out. > > What about 2H-P-x/P-2S-AP ? (2H was a natural weak two, and fourth > hand > bought the contract in 2S.) I'd use L26A "related to" hearts, but I can > see a case for L26B. We have had this argument before about changed calls which might "relate" to another call. However L26B is clear. Cheers, Tony (Sydney) _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml