Re: A strange case of illegal deception
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I fail to see any ILLEGAL deception? > Herman De Wael > Sendt: 16. juli 2016 09:46 > Til: blml > Emne: [BLML] A strange case of illegal deception > > Yesterday, I was playing in my club (the top one of Flanders), in a reasonable > field, against a pair of my strength (= not very good, but no beginners either). > > I'm playing 4Sp on the following lay-out: > > S K Q x x > H K x x > D A J x > C K Q x > > S A x x x x x > H x x > D x x x > C x x x > > RHO has bid hearts and LHO leads a heart. I play small and RHO wins with the > Jack. > She goes in a small trance and returns a trump. > I cash trumps in two rounds and play a club to the King. > She goes in a small trance and ducks. > I see that I can now throw her in if she has only two diamonds, so I play DA and a > small diamond from the table. > She takes the King without any delay. > And goes in a long trance. > And cashes Ace of Hearts and Ace of clubs. > > And I claim - convinced that she has to return a heart or a club and my diamond > will go on the KH. > > But she has another diamond. > > I believe I have been misled. The diamond return is so obvious that my conclusion > that she had only two must be valid. > And my action (the claim) is based on that deception. > > Of course any ruling must include a high probability of a diamond return after all, > but I believe I could make a case for a 10% weight of 4S-1 rather than the > obvious -2. > > Comments? > > Herman. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml