Margarine
Richard Hills <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGZGHAjb5cMTy4Nb04Yxch_5K_frwjzTaTpATzXE9hgZeNzEow@mail.gmail.com> |
Matchpoint pairs Dlr: East Vul: Both In an uncontested auction South opens 1D, North responds 1S, and now South rebids 5H. You, North, hold: AQT94 94 K9 AT82 What call do you make? Best wishes, Richard Hills On Wednesday, July 20, 2016, Richard Hills <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > Tonight and for the next three Tuesday evenings the Canberra Bridge Club > is holding a Butler pairs tournament. The format is a Mitchell movement, > with three 9-board matches per session. I had arranged to play with Hashmat > Ali in this event, but a few days before its start Hashmat informed me that > he had the dreaded lurgy. Therefore I had to organise a substitute for the > first session. > > This I did, choosing a forgetful friend. The friend did not forget to turn > up. Instead, shortly before the starting time the friend was told by > another player that they had entered the tournament, so the fair-weather > substitute promptly decamped. > > Thus I had to get a last-minute second substitute. The new substitute > understandably arrived three boards late. But both he and I are very quick > players, so we finished the first 9-board match with time to spare. > > Suppose, however, that we had completed only eight boards. Should we have > been awarded Average Minus for the board that we missed, because we were > "directly at fault" (Law 12C2)? In my opinion, no. The person directly at > fault was the forgetful "first substitute", and he was now part of a rival > contestant. > > Best wishes, > > Richard Hills > _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml