Re: Margarine
Richard Hills <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGZGHAgUSuHOgx4yzdsH=CvC_1wjO=+LEaPsvqHWp7Qp0HyMwg@mail.gmail.com> |
David Grabiner: What does 5H mean? Richard Hills: It means that North needs a new partner. South choosing an undiscussed jump to the five level is an infraction of Law 72A's second sentence: "The chief object is to obtain a higher score than other contestants whilst complying with the lawful procedures and ethical standards set out in these laws." David Grabiner: .....If partner intended the bid as Exclusion Blackwood..... Richard Hills: Zero Canberra players use the Blackwood variant Exclusion Blackwood (perhaps because that variant is rare and error-prone). Many Canberra players use the Blackwood variant Minorwood (perhaps because that variant is rare and error-prone). Different parts of the world have different preferences for different Special Partnership Understandings / conventions. Hence different Regulating Authorities promulgate different Alert rules. For example, the Aussie Alert regulation requires Alerts and/or pre-Alerts of natural calls that the opponents are "unlikely to expect". So the Ali-Hills partnership pre-Alerts that in auctions such as 1H - 1S - X the double would be a natural penalty double, rather than the expected negative double. Best wishes, Richard Hills On Sunday, July 24, 2016, David Grabiner <[email protected]> wrote: > What does 5H mean? It can't be an asking bid, as partner can't have > enough controls outside of hearts to insist on a 5-level contract if he is > lacking a heart control. If partner has 12 or 13 red cards (- AKQxx > AQJxxxx x), I want to be in 7D or 7N. If partner intended the bid as > Exclusion Blackwood, I can't imagine a hand which could do this without a > play for 7S (KJxxx - AQJxxxx x is likely). So, rather than responding the > systemic 6D to Exclusion, which partner might pass with 12 red cards, I'll > bid 7D, guaranteeing that we will reach some grand. Partner can correct to > 7S if that was his intention. > > 6D is a logical alternative; it would be my choice if I am sure we play > Exclusion, as it will get us to 7S rather than 7D. (Partner can bid 6H > over my 6D to confirm interest in a grand, and I'll bid 7S then.) > > On 7/24/2016 8:05 AM, Richard Hills wrote: > > Matchpoint pairs > Dlr: East > Vul: Both > > In an uncontested auction South opens 1D, North responds 1S, and now South > rebids 5H. > > You, North, hold: > > AQT94 > 94 > K9 > AT82 > > What call do you make? > > Best wishes, > > Richard Hills > > > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml