Re: Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a)

On 2016-07-28 3:39 AM, Sven Pran wrote:
> Law 10C.2 is a "must" law - the strongest there is, and the consequence of
> violating such a law is for the Director to rule at his discretion.

Where do you see that?  I'd expect a DP, but I don't see why the score 
adjustment part of the rectification shouldn't follow normal procedures.

> If he acknowledges that the "suggested" option is the only (reasonable) LA
> then why should he waive that option?

The problem is the TD cannot judge that at the table.  It takes study of 
the hand, understanding the partnership methods, and then consultation. 
Why not just give a normal UI ruling, and examine the case later if the 
UI seems to have been a factor?
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml